Analyze the declaration of the rights of man and citizen and compare it to the declaration of independence what are the similarities and differences provide a list of 6 bullet points

The answer is below

Explanation:

Difference between the Declaration of the rights of man and citizen and the Declaration of independence

1. The Declaration of the rights of man and citizens was written in 1789, while the Declaration of Independence was written in 1776.

2. The Declaration of the rights of man and citizens was written for the French people while the Declaration of Independence was written for the United States people.

3. The Declaration of the rights of man and citizens was about the rights of individuals and equality in France, while the Declaration of Independence was written about the injustice and freedom from British rule

On the other hand, the similarities between the Declaration of the rights of man and citizens and that of the Declaration of Independence can be summarized as the following were both referred to the idea of freedom, liberty, and equality among men.

2. Both documents are based on the principle of getting freedom from tyrannical rule.

3. After the declaration of these documents and despite differences in years, both documents led to war.

unbeknownst to the slave-ship captains, the daily dancing and exercise regime and vernacular dance are also derived from america's african-based slave legacy. both are african-american cuisines from the slavery era.

explanation:

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]