subject
History, 05.01.2021 17:00 BaileyElizabethRay

1. Ayon kay Dr. Manuel Dy, isang propesor ng Pilosopiya sa Ateneo de Manila University, binubuo ng tao ang
lipunan at binubuo ng lipunan ang tao. Ito ay
nangangahulugang:
a. Ang tao ang gumagawa sa lipunan at kaalinsabay nito ay
ang lipunan at hinuhubog ng lipunan ang mga tao
b. Ang tao ang bumubuo sa lipunan dahil mula sa kaniyang
pagsilang ay nariyan na ang pamilyang nag-aaruga sa
kaniya; binubuo ng lipunan ang tao dahil matatagpuan ang
tao sa lahat ng bahagi nito.
C. Ang tao ang bumubuo sa lipunan dahil ang kanilang mg
kontribusyon ang nagpapalago at nagpapatakbo dito;
binubuo ng lipunan ang tao dahil ang lipunan ang
nagbubuklod sa lahat ng tao.
d. Ang tao ang bumubuo sa lipunan dahil pamilya ang
nag-aruga sa tao at dahil matatagpuan ang tao sa lahat ng
bahagi nito; binubuo ng lipunan ang tao dahil sa lipunan
makakamit ang kaniyang kaganapan ng pagkatao.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Which statement best explains how the narrator interacts with the setting? a.the setting makes him lose hope b. the setting makes him envious c. the setting makes him feel angry d. the setting makes him gain confidence the answer is a
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
World war 2 was caused, in part, by which of these factors?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Otto von bismarck once said that a great war might someday be caused by some damed foolish thing in the balkans was he right, explain
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
1. Ayon kay Dr. Manuel Dy, isang propesor ng Pilosopiya sa Ateneo de Manila University, binubuo ng...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 16.10.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 14:01
question
Chemistry, 16.10.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 14:01