Which two candidates for president lost in overwhelming landslides in part because they diverged too far from the middle of the ideological spectrum?

1. George McGovern

2. Barry Goldwater

Explanation:

George McGovern was a former US senator representing South Dakota. In 1972, he became the Democratic Party, presidential candidate. However, he lost the general election woefully in one of the widest landslides victories in United States election history, against Richard Nixon. The reason for his loss is attributed to being diverged too far from the middle of the ideological spectrum of the party.

Similarly, Barry Goldwater was a former US senator representing Arizona. In 1964, he became the Republican Party, presidential candidate. However, he lost the general election woefully against the Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson. One of the reasons for his loss is attributed to being diverged too far from the middle of the ideological spectrum of the party.

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.  

answer: (fluidity)is the correct answer.

explanation: because of this characteristic, success on the battlefield depends in large part on the ability to adapt to proactively change events to our advantage as well as to react quickly to constantly changing conditions