The supreme court case gibbons v ogden showed that A. federal law is superior to state law

B. states have no power over business licenses

C. federal laws regulate business competition

D. states cannot regulate commerce

That federal law was superior to state law

Explanation:

So what happened was that these two dudes had these steam boats in the same area (or something) and one of them sued the other.

Person 1 had permission from state government (to use the boat or something)

Person 2 had permission from federal government (to use the boator something)

Person 2 won because they had permission from federal goverment

i forgot most of what happened, this is all I remember sorry

well first we can compare on what the slave masters ate and what the slaves ate well the masters ate fancy great food like chicken rice mash potatose and stuff like that and slaves ate well food that your not suppost to eat like the weird parts of turkey and chicken and slaves master chilled beat and eat and slaves work get beat and get little of sleep there you go

some american cities felt workers were being oppressed by business monopolies