History, 17.12.2020 01:00 bella122805
HEL
I WILL GIVE FREE BONUS POINTS IF I PASS THIS (NO PLAGERISM)
Historical “revisionism” is the practice of revising the generally accepted version of a history. Rather than assuming that history books and previous historians are “telling the whole truth” about history, revisionists reexamine the evidence left by history and may assign new and different meaning or significance to historical events.
Reasonable people disagree about whether historical revisionism is a valid and beneficial practice. What do you think? Should people accept the version of history that they’ve been taught, or should they look for other ways to interpret, view, or describe historical events?
Explain your answer in a thoughtful discussion post, including your reasons for thinking as you do about revisionism.
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Select 3 oral histories from the section entitled, "oral histories of long walk events", and explain how you would feel if this experience happened to you
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
Ineeed the answer asap which of the following describes the link between u.s. foreign policy and the rise of islamic extremist leaders in afghanistan during the late 20th century? apex
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Most white men in the antebellum south could best be described as a) plantation owners. b) seafaring traders. c) merchants or shopkeepers. d) nonslaveholding family farmers.
Answers: 3
HEL
I WILL GIVE FREE BONUS POINTS IF I PASS THIS (NO PLAGERISM)
Historical “revisionism...
Historical “revisionism...
English, 10.10.2019 13:50
Mathematics, 10.10.2019 13:50
English, 10.10.2019 13:50
English, 10.10.2019 13:50
Health, 10.10.2019 13:50
Mathematics, 10.10.2019 13:50
History, 10.10.2019 13:50
History, 10.10.2019 13:50