subject
History, 15.12.2020 02:10 joslynndiggs

PLEASE HELP In Kelo v. City of New London (2005), the Supreme Court decided that the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause permits a city or state to take private land from one private party and transfer ownership of that land to another private party if doing so furthers economic development. That is, the Supreme Court broadly interpreted the term "public use” in the takings clause to include "public purpose.”

Suppose that the federal government wished to prevent such takings by states and municipalities in the future. Discuss what legislation Congress could enact to do so. Discuss the potential basis for such power.

In the context of the scenario, discuss how such actions by the federal government would promote or interfere with principles of federalism, and discuss the potential constitutionality of such actions

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Who's idea was it for businessmen to use their wealth for the greater good of society? (gospel of wealth ~ap u.s. history
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:50
Between 1870 and 1916, approximately how many immigrants came to the united states? 10 million 25 million 75 million 125 million
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Which of the following is not a requirement to become a us representative (congressman/congresswoman)?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:20
How are the republican and democratic presidential candidates chosen? a. they are nominated by their state governments. b. each is nominated by his or her respective party. c. each is chosen by the governor of his or her home state. d. they are chosen by the house of representatives.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
PLEASE HELP In Kelo v. City of New London (2005), the Supreme Court decided that the Fifth Amendmen...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.12.2019 13:31
question
History, 26.12.2019 13:31
question
English, 26.12.2019 13:31