Military historians speak of the difference between shock warfare (striking the enemy with weapons like swords, lances, or axes) and projectile warfare (shooting or throwing arrows, javelins, and bullets).
Judging from the armor, which kind of warfare was fought by samurai and knights? In each case,
explain your thinking.

Shock warfare: knights were better suited because their armor allowed the knight to ride up to his enemy and make a direct hit. It DIDN’T allow for the knight to throw things at his enemy because of its rigidness.

Projectile warfare: samurai were better suited because their armor had the right arm free which allowed the warrior to THROW things at his enemy or use his bow & arrow.

Explanation:

billygate was not one of the scandals

"i care deeply about campaign finance reforms: - apex