subject
History, 09.12.2020 18:10 sevanah5506

Zorach v. Clauson What position would people who the broad interpretation of the establishment clause takes on this issue?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 12:30
Nhow the other half lives, jacob riis: a. wrote about captains of industry. b. highlighted the benefits of the second industrial revolution. c. provided a fictional account of life in 1890. d. discussed the lives of wealthy americans. e. focused on the wretched conditions of new york city slums.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
What is the definition of an appeal in a criminal court case? a.an appeal is a request for the verdict to be reconsidered. b.an appeal is the decision about the proper punishment. c.an appeal is the decision that states “guilty” or “not guilty.”d. an appeal is a request for a new judge to oversee the trial.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Respond to the scenario regarding spanish colonial life in latin america.you are a creole living in venezuela. your family is wealthy and you are well educated. through your education, you have learned about enlightenment ideas regarding life, liberty, and property. although you are not in a position of power, you enjoy a comfortable life. when a revolution spreads in your country, you are faced with a decision to become a supporter of venezuelan independence, or support spain, and your current way of life. what do you do? write 5 paragraphs
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Zorach v. Clauson What position would people who the broad interpretation of the establishment claus...
Questions
question
English, 16.12.2020 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 21:30
question
Spanish, 16.12.2020 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 21:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 21:30