Hep! 1.What conclution does Hamilton draw about the revlationshlp between the states and the army?
2.According to Hamilton, should the power of the purse be controlled by the states or Congress? Explain.

The confederation gives the states individually too much influence in the affairs ofthe army. They should have nothing to do with it. The entire formation and disposal of our military forces ought to belong to Congress. It is an essential cement of the union, and it ought to be the policy of Congress to destroy all ideas of state attachments In the army and make it look up wholly to them The confederation too gives the power of the purse too entirely to the state legislatures. It should provide perpetual funds in the disposal of Congress—by a land tax, poll tax, or the like. All imposts upon commerce ought to be lald by Congress and appropriated to their use, for without certain revenues a government can have no power. That power which holds the purse strings absolutely must rule.

1)He came to believe that the survival of the United States depended on its ability to provide for its self-defense, and his plans to strengthen the political union, eloquently expressed during the fight to ratify the Constitution, were directly linked to his ideas on military matters.

2)Hamilton envisioned the judiciary as being the "weakest" and "least dangerous" of the three great branches of government: "Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them." In Hamilton's mind, based upon his experience and that of the nation at the time, dangerous strength was found in the ability to wield the sword and to control the purse, neither of which the judiciary possessed.

Explanation:

answer by yourhope:

the speaker of which statement would be best served by joining an interest group?

i want politicians to make more of an effort for lgbt rights!

: )