subject
History, 31.10.2019 04:31 cdradlet2001

When chief justice john marshall wrote "a law repugnant to the constitution is void" in the case marbury v. madison, what was he claiming?
a. the framers should have taken more care designing the legislative branch.
b. laws unsupported by the constitution are automatically unlawful.
c. the supreme court will take over lawmaking duties should it be necessary.
d. the supreme court has the right to declare laws of congress unconstitutional.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
What factor aided the russians in defeating napoleon's troops?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
How did the mexican war of independence differ from the american revolution? o a. only the american revolution was concerned with establishing a representative form of government. o b. only the mexican war of independence required military conflict to achieve its objectives. o c. only the american revolution succeeded in replacing a monarchy with another form of government. o d. only the mexican war of independence eliminated spanish colonial control over part of north america.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:00
After studying the timeline above, what observations can you make about u.s. environmental policy between 1970 and 1996?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:30
How many battles in wwii were fought on u.s. soil? a. 0 b. 1 c. 2 d. 3
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
When chief justice john marshall wrote "a law repugnant to the constitution is void" in the case mar...
Questions
question
History, 18.11.2019 06:31
question
Mathematics, 18.11.2019 06:31
question
Physics, 18.11.2019 06:31