Explain an action that congress could take to respond to the Arizona v. United States decision if it disagreed with the decision

Congress is termed as the national party that has vast and widespread roots all over India. This party was founded in the year 1885. This was the very first party that was established during the years of the British empire in Asia and Africa.

Arizona v. the United States was related to the power and freedom of authorities and representatives of local governments in relation to federal immigration laws.

To know more about the congress party, refer to the link below:

link

Congress could make the decision to provide subsidies to local governments.

Explanation:

Arizona v. United States was related to the power and freedom of authorities and representatives of local governments in relation to federal immigration laws. This autonomy could cause local governments to act in disagreement with federal immigration objectives. As a result, Congress decided that federal laws would be valid laws across the country, but local governments could establish their own guidelines regarding investigation of factors involving immigration.

Congress could have decided to provide subsidies to local governments that did not have the capacity to comply with federal immigration laws, so that they had sufficient resources to comply with them.

executive, (president and about 5,000,000 workers) legislative (senate and house of representatives) and judicial (supreme court and lower courts)

explanation:

a phrase from a poem by ralph waldo emerson about the battle of lexington and concord. emerson's words read, “here once the embattled farmers stood / and fired the shot heard round the world.”