subject
History, 03.12.2020 04:20 sarah8479

The U. S. Supreme Court came to a decision not long ago about the proper application of the word “use.” Briefly, the case in point was about a man named John Angus Smith who traded a handgun for cocaine. The law under which Smith was charged provided for a much more severe penalty—known as an enhanced penalty—if a gun was used in a drug-related crime than if no gun was involved. (In this case, the enhanced penalty was a mandatory thirty-year sentence; the “unenhanced” penalty was five years.) Justice Antonin Scalia argued that Smith’s penalty should not be enhanced because he did not use the gun in the way that the writers of the law had in mind; he did not use it as a gun. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor argued that the law requires only the use of a gun, not any particular kind of use. If you were a judge, would you vote with Scalia or with O’Connor? Construct an argument in support of your position.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Wich part of the declaration of independence acts as an implied plan of action in that it lists laws and practices to be changed
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Martin luther started the protestant movement when he split from the church in 1517. what area of europe was he from?   a.  england  b.  italy  c.  yugoslavia  d.  germany
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following would an isolationist support?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
*history * who was clyde ross and how was he impacted by housing discrimination?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The U. S. Supreme Court came to a decision not long ago about the proper application of the word “us...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.05.2021 17:00
question
French, 27.05.2021 17:00