Why do you think was he greatly criticized on his work, Historia General de Filipinas and what are the suggestions that you could have given to him before the publication of this book?

Vidal was criticized for his work because it seemed inaccurate and with little veracity.

Explanation:

"Historia General de Filipinas" written by Vidal, was not well received by critics. That's because it showed a history with little evidence, which made the work imprecise, with little veracity and academically weak. Although the work was appreciated by many readers around the world, for its simple and direct language.

To correct the errors, I would advise Vidal to do more in-depth research on the history of the Philippines, finding documents that prove the facts he is addressing, making the narrative more accurate.

lincoln won 212 electoral votes to mcclellan's 21 votes, and lincoln beat mcclellan. is the main reason lincoln won in 1864.

after world war ii, the united states and the soviet union were the major economic, military, and political powers. the world was bilateral multipolar bipolar unilateral

after world war ii, the united states and the soviet union were the major economic, military, and political powers. the world was bipolar.  

the great leap forward, mao zedong's plan to increase china's agricultural and industrial production, was an overwhelming success. true false

the great leap forward, mao zedong's plan to increase china's agricultural and industrial production, was an overwhelming success. true.

explanation: