what are two reasons people’s perceptions of the congressional effectiveness go up and then what are 2 reasons it would go down?

once a widely trusted institution, experienced such a uniquely dramatic decline in the public’s confidence, and what are the consequences for democracy? This article sets out to systematically address these questions. First, I discuss how we can gauge Americans’ levels of trust in Congress. Second, I examine trends over time in public trust in Congress, looking both partisan differences within this measure, and also overall differences in comparison to other institutions. Third, I examine various ways in which the much-noted rise in party polarization in Congress might explain the downward trend in Americans’ trust in that institution. Finally, I explore one potentially important consequence of declining trust in the legislative branch: Americans’ willingness to obey laws. The results suggest that those interested in the problem of declining trust in government would be wise to focus their attention on Congress. Compared to other institutions, the problem in Congress appears more severe, more intractable, and carries greater political consequences.

Explanation:

correct sequence:

a) soviet leader nikita khrushchev denied the existence of missiles in cuba.   (already in september, 1962, khrushchev warned the us against attacking any supply ships the ussr brought into cuba and denied the presence of any offensive weapons.)

c) a us reconnaissance plane discovered missiles being installed in cuba.   (the discovery was made october 15, 1962.)

e) us president john f. kennedy ordered the us navy to form a barrier around cuba.

f) us president john f. kennedy demanded an end of the secret operation.   (in an october 22, 1962, speech, kennedy announced to the nation the naval blockade he had ordered and announced to the soviet union his demand that they stop their operation and remove their missiles.)

d) us president john f. kennedy promised to not invade cuba and to dismantle us   missiles that were installed in turkey.

b) soviet leader nikita khrushchev offered to dismantle the missiles in cuba in exchange   for certain promises from the united states.

the cuban missile crisis was a tense face-off between america, led by president john f. kennedy and the soviet union, led by nikita khrushchev, in october of 1962, over the placement of soviet missiles on the island of cuba, close to the united states home territory.   it is often stated that this moment was the closest the usa and the ussr ever came to the eruption of an actual nuclear war between the two superpowers.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: