How was the power of the shogun different from that of the emperor? The shogun did not have an army, while the emperor used samurai as soldiers.
The shogun came from the same class as the emperor but had a different position.
The shogun did not own land, while the emperor came from the wealthy landowning class.
The shogun came to rule through military power, while the emperor had an inherited title.

Below :)

Explanation:

Just look at this- During the majority of Japanese history, the Shogun was dramatically more powerful than the Emperor. From the beginning of the Kamakura period the Shogun controlled how much money the Emperor received, as well as controlling the military. During the Sengoku period when there was no Shogun, the Emperor controlled no military forces, and had no real power.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.

literally just took the test, got a 100%. i couldn't be bothered to type it all out, so i just took pictures.

should be in order from q 1 to 35.