I NEED HELP PLEASE ASAP!

Most Likely C; The East India Company did not allow adopted children to claim inheritance.

Explanation:

According to the doctrine, any Indian princely state under the suzerainty of the British East India Company (the dominant imperial power in the Indian subsidiary system), would have its princely status abolished (and therefore be annexed into British India) if the ruler was either "manifestly incompetent or died without a male heir"The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor. In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough. The doctrine and its applications were widely regarded by many Indians as illegitimate.

Because broadest terms allows the law flexibility depending on changing society and circumstances.