Periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence. —Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78

Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis?

Permanent appointments allow for greater regulation but less independence.
Periodic appointments promote a fatal independence.
Periodic appointments are hard to regulate.
Periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.

wwii

explanation:

a standing committee

explanation:

well it definitly does because if you are seen as weak you will be seen as unimportant and they will walk all over you and the us is the most powerful military and the largest in the world

hope this

answer:

won re-nomination with no opposition he also had the support of his party

explanation:

it saw incumbent president andrew jackson, candidate of the democratic party, defeat henry clay, candidate of the national republican party. jackson won re-nomination with no opposition, and the 1832 democratic national convention replaced vice president john c. calhoun with martin van buren.