Based on your understanding of both Catherine Barnard and the time period, do you think Catherine tried to go too far in enacting social reform? Did she go far enough? Defend your position in 75 to 100 words, and be sure to use specific examples of her actions.

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.

the french revolution was when many people were persecuted for disagreeing or making separate government

as the person below or above me i agree   the tone of voice of the itnerview can very well influecne he or she to pick one more over that   the infleuncer would pick

answer:   the name of this act is known as the:

    " american recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 " .