At the end of the article, the author argues that the expedition’s vote was significant because it reflected the promises made in the Declaration of Independence. Explain his argument, and evaluate whether you agree or disagree with his conclusions. Support your analysis with reasons and evidence. Access the reading here.

No matter if you aren’t in the country because you were sent out or not doesn’t mean you get to be not accounted for. The expedition was made by the president so he should count their votes in too because he was the one who decided to send them away.

Explanation:

It worked for me

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.