In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable. “We the knights, citizens, and burgesses of the Commons House in Parliament find, to the great grief of our hearts, that the designs of the priests and the Jesuits, and other adherents to Rome, have of late been more boldly and more frequently put in practice, to the undermining and danger of the ruin of the true reformed Protestant religion in his majesty’s dominions. We also find that there have been, and have just cause to suspect that there still are, even during this sitting in Parliament, endeavours to subvert the fundamental laws of England and Ireland, and to introduce the exercise of an arbitrary and tyrannical government.

And we find that diverse innovations and superstitions have been brought into the church, multitudes driven out of his majesty’s dominions, jealousies raised between the king and his people, a popish army raised in Ireland, and armies brought into the heart of this kingdom. All to the hazard of his majesty’s royal person, the consumption of the revenue of the crown, and treasure of this kingdom. And lastly, we find that endeavours have been and are used to bring the English army into conflict with this Parliament. . . . Therefore we thought it good to join ourselves in a declaration of our united affections and resolutions, and to make this ensuing Protestation.

THE PROTESTATION:

I, , in the presence of Almighty God promise, vow, and protest, to maintain and defend, as far as lawfully I may with my Life, Power, and Estate, the true Reformed Protestant Religion, expressed in the Doctrine of the Church of England against all Popery and Popish Innovations according to the duty of my Allegiance to His Majesty’s Royal Person, Honour and Estate.”

Protestation of the House of Commons, London, 1641

a) Describe the historical situation that led to the creation of this Protestation.

b) Describe the likely purpose of the Protestation.

c) Describe one piece of evidence used to support Parliament’s claim about the threat to the kingdom.

question:  

the chart compares religious beliefs to us political party support.

religious beliefs and party support, 2012

this chart demonstrates that

a) more highly religious people supported the republican candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the democratic candidate.

b) more highly religious people supported the democratic candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the republican candidate.

c) more moderately religious people supported the republican candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the democratic candidate.

d) more moderately religious people supported the democratic candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the republican candidate.

answer: a.

they wanted the u.s. to fight on the side of the central powers.

the three roles stated in the dialogue develop the siblings' personalities.

lloyd's personality looks like a trademarketer

dana's personality is afraid from lloyd's behavior and the oldest sister is a decided person who tries to solve any conflict

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this