Which best compares the Patricians and the Plebeians in Roman society and the
economy?

Hello. You did not put the answer options, but we can say that the best comparison between patricians and commoners is that patricians belonged to the nobility and had political, economic and social rights. The commoners, on the contrary, were not part of the nobility, nor did they have any kind of rights.

Explanation:

The Roman population was composed of commoners and patricians, who had many differences between them. The patricians were noble, owned land and were the true holders of the region's political power. They had full access to education and were considered superiors with all the privileges that the empire could offer. In addition, they were the sole holders of political, economic and social rights. Unlike the commoners, who were servants and had no political, economic or social privileges for a long time.

on the morning of  july 21,  1861, general mcdowell ordered the  unionarmy to attack. it was on this hill that  confederate  colonel thomas jackson and his forces held back theunion  troops.

roosevelt essentially took the opposite approach as hoover in taking on the great depression. herbert hoover thought that america and its economy could naturally recover from the depression in due course, so he adamantly restrained the federal government from intervening on behalf of the people affected. on the other hand, roosevelt dramatically increased employment by expanding the federal government and establishing agencies that would aid in relieving some of the country's worst problems.