HELP ASAP Opinions in which Supreme Court justices express disagreement with majorities have
often proven more influential over time, or at least been more elegantly and
powerfully written, than majority opinions because:

A)dissenters have no need to please a majority, and may also write to persuade
other justices, or appeal to a larger legal community about an issue.

B)the dissent assignments are handed out with special care, more so than
assignments for majority opinions.

C)people are more likely to side with underdogs, as much in Supreme Court cases
as in life.

D)chief justices assign dissenting opinions when seeing conflicting decisions
between lower courts on the horizon.