Which was an argument for independence used in the pamphlet Common Sense?

He argued for two main points: (1) independence from England and (2) the creation of a democratic republic. Paine avoided flowery prose. He wrote in the language of the people, often quoting the Bible in his arguments. Most people in America had a working knowledge of the Bible, so his arguments rang true. In arguing for American independence, Paine denounced the monarchy and argued that people are born in to a state of equality. An advocate of natural rights theory, Paine claimed that there are no natural rulers among men. He then proposed a system of representative government for the colonies. Common Sense is a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine in 1775–1776 advocating independence from Great Britain to people in the Thirteen Colonies. Writing in clear and persuasive prose, Paine marshaled moral and political arguments to encourage common people in the Colonies to fight for egalitarian government. Revolutionary leader who wrote the pamphlet Common Sense (1776) arguing for American independence from Britain. ... the document written to declare the American colonies as an independent nation, free from British rule. One of the main reasons Thomas Paine's pamphlet became so popular was because Paine, unlike many writers from his time, used a lot of, well, common sense arguments that average people could understand. The most powerful argument by Thomas Paine for independence was probably his publication of Common Sense in 1776. This book made an extraordinary sell of about 120,000 copies. He argued with many examples of why it wasn't meant for Britain to control colonial England. d stands in opposition to monarchy. Paine moves on to attack the notion of the hereditary succession of the monarchy. Paine argues that, since all men are born equal, no man could have the right to establish his family as forever presiding over others. In the original 14th century meaning of the term, 'common sense' was a sense like our other senses. It was an internal feeling that was regarded as the common bond that united all the other human senses, the 'five wits' as they were known, and was something akin to what we now call 'heart’.

Communicating with the dead was common, it wasn’t seen as bizarre or weird,” explains murch. “it’s hard to imagine that now, we look at that and think, ‘why are you opening the gates of hell? ’