Do you think that by opposing the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act, known as granting Filipino’s independence was a good decision for the Filipinos at the time? Why or Why not?

it is a good decision for the Filipinos to make the independence decision.

The Hawes-Cutting Act is a legislation passed to set a process for the Philippines to gain independence from the United States.

The opposition of the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act is also known as granting Filipino’s independence.

However, the granting of Filipino’s independence was good decision for the Filipinos at that time because they were allowed to take indefinite possession of U.S. military bases in the islands which was not acceptable for the people of Philippines.

In conclusion, it is a good decision for the Filipinos to make the independence decision.

Read more about this here

link

Yes.

Explanation:

Opposing the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act which is known as granting Filipino’s independence was a good decision for the Filipinos at that time because in this act allowed to take indefinite possession of U.S. military bases in the islands which was not acceptable for the people of Philippines. So the people of Philippines started struggles for their independence from the foreign powers and this time is the right time for gaining independence so Filipino political leader Manuel Quezon led a campaign against the bill that leads to independence.

the right answer is the end of world war ii

after the end of a global wwii all the nations involved, in an attempt to create an organization to maintain world peace. this agreement would work settling international disputes via negotiation and arbitration instead of leading the issues escalate to another war.

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.