subject
History, 22.10.2020 19:01 nathangirnet

How did the "rule of reason," supported by William Howard Taft, differ from Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism? The New Nationalism would seek government control over telephone and telegraph rates while the "rule of reason" would not.
The New Nationalism would back stronger government power to bust trusts while the "rule of reason" would weaken that power.
The New Nationalism would weaken the hard line set by the Sherman Antitrust Act while the "rule of reason" would strengthen it.
The New Nationalism would allow trusts to squeeze out smaller businesses while the "rule of thumb" would not.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
Which of the following resulted from the passage of the dawes act in 1887?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:50
In which supreme court case did the court rely on the concept of implied powers to make its ruling? a) gibson v. ogden b) mcculloch v. maryland c) dartmouth college v. woodward d marbury v. madison
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:30
According to mr. lee’s announcement, which of these might be the focus of his campaign?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:10
100 53. how have developed western countries affected non-western developing nations during the modern period? explain how three political, economic, and/or cultural approaches by european and other western countries shaped the developing world over the last 250 years. use examples from your studies to support your ideas and opinions.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did the "rule of reason," supported by William Howard Taft, differ from Theodore Roosevelt's New...
Questions