Zhou enlai was the prime minister under mao zedong. zhou made the following comment in a discussion with u. s. president richard nixon on february 23, 1972:
"you know our policy. we don't discuss our policy. we of course support revolutions raged by the peoples of the world, but we don't send a single soldier abroad. the revolution of any country must depend on the people of their country. that was the case with george washington, in your eight-year war of independence. of course, at the time you had the assistance of the volunteers of lafayette; they were not troops sent by the state of france."—zhou enlai, 1972
source: the national security archive
what does the above statement say about china's government under mao zedong and zhou enlai?
a. it refused to debate its policies with foreign countries.
b. it wanted to become an ally of the united states.
c. it did not want communism to spread to other countries.
d. it wanted to use the approach of the u. s. government.

the hollywood film industry of 1950 was threatened on several different fronts. television broadcasting was rapidly becoming the dominant entertainment medium in the united states. the paramount anti-trust consent decree requiring separate ownership for production companies and theater chains had gone into effect on 1 january 1950. large numbers of young men and women were marrying, having children, and moving to the suburbs, which affected the viability of downtown first-run movie theaters. foreign revenues were endangered by protectionist tactics including quota systems, high taxes, and blocked funds. finally, the morality and patriotism of hollywood films and filmmakers were under attack from government, religious, and citizens' groups.

explanation:

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.