Help please!! Explain how Indian perceptions of the relationship between the two groups differ

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Your question is incomplete. It does not mention what are the perceptions you are referring to. You did not include any text, authors, or references.

However, doing some research we can have an idea of the kind of information we need to help you with the following comments.

We are talking about the different perceptions in the opinions of Colonel John Bradstreet and Sir William Johnson. Bothe wrote opinions about the Six Nations, Native American Indian tribes.

So Indian perceptions of the relationship between the two groups differ in that Johnson said that although they were savages, they were smart people that lived a simple life and had all their needs covered.

Bradstreet wrote that the Six Nations tribes were warriors such as the Shawannese and Delawares and were difficult to deal with, but they could serve as intermediaries with other tribes against the French.

the answer is bastille

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3