What warrant (right) have we to take that land, which is and hath been of long time possessed by others..? That which is common to all is proper to none. (Native Americans) ruleth over many lands without title or property, for they enclose [fence in) no ground, neither have they cattle to maintain it
And why may not Christians have liberty to go and dwell amongst them in their wasted lands and woods (leaving them such places as they have (fertilized for their corn)...? For God hath given to
the sons of men a twofold right to the earth; there is a natural right and a civil political right. The first right was natural when men held the earth in common, every man sowing and feeding where he
pleased. Then, as men and cattle increased, they appropriated some parcels of ground by enclosing them as property and this in time got them a civil right."
John Winthrop, future governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. "General Considerations for the Plantation in New England1629
s
Using the excerpt answer (a), (b), and (c)
(a) Briefly identify ONE historical situation in which the excerpt was produced.
(b) Briefly describe ONE argument made in the excerpt.
(c) Briefly identify ONE historical effect of the development described in the excerpt.

b

explanation:

pacal the great: the throne was passed on to pacal through a female; as a result, he believed that he must legitimize his claim to the throne to add stability to his reign.

as a result, the daughter of ac kan's brother ruled until her son, pacal, reached an age old enough to assume the throne.

pacal the great became the king of the mayan city of palenque in a different way than most mayan kings.

pacal pointed out that ac kan had succeeded his mother as ruler, thereby establishing a precedent for the rule to pass through a female.  

he tried to justify that the way he gained the throne by connecting his mother with the divine mother and the mythological events that happened during the creation of the world.  

typically, the son of a male mayan ruler inherited the throne, but in 612 ce, king ac kan died and did not leave behind a male heir.

montezuma 1: even so, these wars of conquest failed to provide enough human sacrifices and because of this, he formed a triple alliance with cities in the valley of puebla-tlascala.  

in addition, montezuma realized that his government failed to the aztecs during the famine.

in order to appease him, montezuma increased the number of human sacrifices.

the aztec performed human sacrifices to their god huitzilopotchli because they believed he desired human blood.  

around 1440 ce, montezuma i became the fifth emperor of the aztecs and went on to rule for 28 years.  

soon after he assumed the throne, the aztecs were hit with a series of disasters, namely a plague of locusts, a flood, and a harsh frost  

huayna capac: huayna capac also fought to gain territories north of his empire in what is now ecuador.  

huayna capac significantly extended the inca empire to the south, into what is now argentina and chile.  

in 1493 ce, huayna capac became the eleventh ruler of the inca empire.  

huayna, therefore, wanted to gain his own lands and launched campaigns against tribes to the east and north of the empire.  

the inca empire reached its peak under the rule of huayna capac.

during this time the empire covered a vast territory including parts of present day colombia, peru, argentina, chile, bolivia, and ecuador.

during his reign, huayna heard about bearded men with pale skin that resembled the incan1 god viracocha and took this news as a bad omen.

huayna took this as another bad omen that predicted the destruction of the empire.

no statements but ok.

the statement that best describes the idea of manifest destiny that was used in the 19th century would be that "it was fate that the united states would continue to  expand westward," since people thought the us was "destined" to do so.