How were the respective arguments of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding ratification the Constitistion similar? How were they different?

(Short answer)

The federalist believed that the constitution was needed and strong enough to replace the articles of confederation. while the anti- federalist thought that the constitution gave too much power to the president and could lead to a monarchy or dictatorship and thought the articles of confederation should stay

(extra)

the federalist and anti-federalist came to a agreement that the constitution will be allowed to pass as long as the first 10 amendments were added on afterwards.

Explanation:

states

explanation:

as the old saying goes, all politics are local. state and federal governments affect our daily lives in numerous ways. yet, in our federal system, there is supposed to be a balance between federal and state power. as james madison envisioned it in federalist no. 51, “the power surrendered by the people” would be “divided between two distinct governments,” creating a balance of power that would enable the “different governments [to] control each other.”

ayatollah khomeini can best be described as the leader who declared iran to be an islamic republic.