Discuss the conclusions you can draw from thinking about how history is told. Consider how historians are persuaded by their own biases, motivations, and influences of their time about Pearl S Buck.

History is never ending. There are different multiple conclusions that can drawn from history as it is, History they say do repeats itself. It is new everyday and never ending.

A lot of times, bad treatment in the past are the result of historians' bias. They give some measures of bias in evidence, and sometimes explain it when reconstructing the events of the past.

They are only pursuaded if it does not occur because the historian wants the outcome she has produced to take place.

Learn more about Historians from

link

The histography of ancient times is a complex study that needs to be examined from every possible angle to clear the picture of the past.

Explanation:

It is always a concern about the historians that to what extent they can remain unaffected from their surrounding while writing history. And ancient history was marked by despotic rule where any criticism about the head of the state and strong institution would immediately deal with harsh punishment. Moreover, the credibility of historians can be doubted when we study that they were dependent on the royal patronage and therefore have worked to legitimate the royal authority.

c is the correct answer for this question.

the  equal rights amendment  (era) states: "equality  of  rights  under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the united states or by any state on account of sex." congress first introduced the era in 1923, but the campaign for ratification took off in the 1960s during the  civil rightsmovement.