Need help asap pls<3 How does a constitutional monarchy differ from an absolute monarchy?

a) It gives kings and queens much more power.

b) It allows judges to put a king or queen in jail.

c) It prevents kings and queens from making laws.

d) It puts limits on the power of the king and queen.

It puts limits on the power of the king and queen

Explanation:

the king and queen have to follow the lines of the constitutional monarchy. this constitution is created by a group of people which prevents the monarchy from having absolute power. if this constitution did not exist, the king or queen could make up rules according to their own preferences, which could harm the society.

what precedent do you see the ordinance of 1787 setting for the 1st amendment of the us constitution : )

this person under me, copied me. owo

most are appointed by the president and confirmed by a vote in the senate. however, appeals court judges appoint federal bankruptcy judges, and district judges appoint federal magistrate judges. the qualifications for these positions vary depending on the preferences of the person reviewing nominees.

hope this , give me brainliest answer = )