subject
History, 03.08.2020 14:01 nique1024

In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to mean that:
A. states had to redistrict to ensure that all votes counted equally.
B. states could redistrict to ensure that rural votes counted more than urban votes
C. states were not obligated to redistrict to ensure all votes counted equally.
D. states could determine when and how often they would redistrict

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Who introduced arabic numerals to italy, which make bookkeeping possible? a. brunelleschi b. cosimo de medici c. fibonacci d. gregory xi e. giovanni de bicci de medici
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:20
How does eurydice slipping back into the underworld support the theme
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Which of the following describes an effect of world war ll on the united states economy a. automobile companies produced a record number of cars b. many factories had to expand to produce military equipment c. the airplane industry suffered as the allies began using airplanes in combat d.cities with shipyards declined because so many ships had been sent overseas.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
1. what potential advantages could companies like standard oil offer consumers?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to mean that:
A. s...
Questions
question
World Languages, 19.10.2019 00:30
question
History, 19.10.2019 00:30