Which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a driver’s license should be changed to 18? Some 16-year-olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them. Some 16-year-olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone. Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less-experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents. Changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldn’t cause too much of a problem, because it’s only two years older than 16.

C.) Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less-experienced drivers are are more likely to have accidents.

Explanation:

-correct on Edg-

Hope this helps ^^

The answer is C Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less-experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.

Explanation:

well the fact it is basically a peninsula allowed trade to come from many places, thus allowing cultural diffusion to take place. india has seasonal monsoons that merchants travel back and forth from india using the monsoons wind patterns

this isn't a question and if you're going to list things be kind and use commas.