6. Describe a time in the debate when someone made a point and did not back it up with strong reasons and evidence.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, the question is incomplete because it does not provide what kind of debate it is referring to, or who were their protagonists.

However, we can comment on the following.

As we do not know what debate the question is referring to, lets put an example when a candidate did not provide hard data or back it up

with strong reasons and evidence.

In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone. He told that they were a threat to America. It was a simple accusation just to enrage their followers. He did not prove it with serious data. Indeed, the Media published that there had been many more crimes committed by American citizens that immigrants. But what the candidate wanted to create was a sentiment of hate to support its platform against immigration.

it was on the rise and doing very well and would continue to do well until the great depression from 1929-1939

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."