Whenever archaeologists excavate a site. they use primary and secondary sources to
learn about that site and its artifacts. Are
these research methods enough to give
complete information about the discovered
site or artifact? What other methods do you
suggest to help uncover more information
about the archaeological find? Do you think
that information gained from oral history is
helpful or misleading while concluding an
archaeological find

on the whole, dickens has shown the french revolution and its this site might you. good at his job, and the subject matter he chose, 

working boots at local festivals

so, based on the research i've done. the u.s. government were always on a wild goose chase just to take down castro. he then retired his trone to his brother raul in 2008 due to some health issues. so it's obvious your answer would be:

castro had no allies from which he could receive aid.

hope this and have a fantastic day!

                                                    -wolfiewolffromsketch