What is the best example of legal pluralism? Group of answer choices -Indian litigants could only pursue their cases in British courts with -British judges. -Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied.
-The British hired Muslims and Hindu legal experts to explain the English legal system to Indians.
-Indians could not serve on juries or act as judges.
-The British used British-style jury trials in all legal proceedings.
I NEED HELP ON THIS QUESTION ANYONE

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

your mothers brothers brother in law would be your father.

it should be a. song dynasty’s civil service examination system created an administrative bureaucracy manned by the landed aristocracy.

it broke up the ottoman empire (just a small fact) and the turkish leaders lost many soldiers.