Compare Mussolini's rise to power and totalitarian state in Italy that of Hitler's rise to power and totalitarian state in Germany.

Explanation: Both, like most of the world then and now, was developing an economic depression from hordes of excess labor undercutting wages and depleting resources.  Overpopulation was not under control anywhere then and the world had overwhelmed the current technology's ability to access sufficient resources for the expanding hordes of people.  So it was once again time for the most desperate to attack neighbors and take their land and resources.  WW I had slaughtered some excess people but its stagnant trench warfare did almost nothing to acquire more useful land for anyone.

The people of Italy, Spain, and Germany became interested in Marxist international socialist and fascist national socialist policies in their growing desperation.  Because the national socialists promised to protect national industries and its jobs against foreign competition undercutting them, they won the competition between the two radical socialist philosophies.

Italy's Mussolini developed the fascist "corporatist" national socialist structure.  It was a more efficient shallow bureaucratic system that "incorporated" each industry under a single government bureau that controlled it.

Spain and Germany copied Italy's model.  Italy's economy started improving and it began more conquests south into Africa and east into the Balkans to feed it.  Spain became mired with a war against its Marxists who were raging jealous against the national socialist's popularity "stealing" their proletariat from them.  Communists from other countries, including the US, entered Spain to help their communists.  The German national socialists sided with Franco, Spain's fascist leader, and helped defeat the communists in a fierce civil war made famous by writers like Hemingway.

Germany was the most successful with the system.  It was well suited to the traditional German culture's stricter discipline and socialist origins (according to Marx).  Their economy improved most rapidly and the world was fascinated at it's initial success until it began its conquest for the land needed by it's expanding population.  LIke Greece, Rome, and France before it, it decided to take so much as it could, not just what it needed for the immediate future.  The rest is history you should already know.

I hope this helps :D

the french revolution main idea was to give power to the people. the revolution was influenced by the enlightenment ideas, reasoning and skepticism pushed people to revolt against standards and norms in french society.

the problem was that the revolution caused political turmoil, and napoleon saw this as an opportunity and launched a coup d’état in november 1799. he became the first consul of france and later named french emperor.

some people see napoleon as a hero of the revolution and others see him as a traitor.

people see him as a traitor because he noticed the political turmoil and used this moment to rise to power. others see him as a hero of the revolution because he had some political and military achievements - in which he was committed to promoting the achievements of the french revolution - he had extensive public constructions, made a civil reform.

in a bigger picture, napoleon had some huge achievements in france which made him very important, but the fact that he seized power to himself makes him an undeniable traitor to the revolution since the main idea of it was to remove people from power and give power to the people.

d) iowa i believe is the answer