Why was it strange when John Hay announced that all nations had agreed to an Open Door Policy in China? A.) because it was the Boxers' idea

B.) because it angered the anti-imperialist forces back home

C. ) because none of the other foreign powers had accepted it

This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.

Why was it strange when John Hay announced that all nations had agreed to an Open Door Policy in China?

A. because it was the Boxers’ idea

B. because American businesses had no interest in  China

C. because it angered the anti imperialist forces back home

D. because none of the other foreign powers had  accepted it

D. because none of the other foreign powers had  accepted it

Explanation:

In 1900, when John Hay announced that all nations had agreed to the Open Door policy, he had actually interpreted the evasive responses from Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia as a positive consent in principle.

Furthermore, even after that, and despite several treaties referring to the Open Door Policy, competition over getting special concessions in China still remained.

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005

england is crowded cold and polluted while north america was like the opposite