Why were the Enforcement Acts passed during Reconstruction? A. To prevent groups like the Ku Klux Klan from taking away the civil rights of African Americans

B. To provide food, clothing, and shelter to newly freed slaves

C. To ensure that newly freed slaves received a free public education

D. To limit the civil liberties that were granted to African Americans by the Fourteenth Amendment

not to sure sdi, strategic defense initiative

your mom

now im just trying to get this to 20 characters hope it works hey it works hope it okay bye

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

hi the answer to your question is

to control offices

this sparked alotof controversy more over ending the articles of federation