In at least 150-200 words, compare and contrast the teachings of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X.

The answer is below

Explanation:

There are various similarities and contradictions between Malcom X and Martin Luther King Jr, some of which are:

1. While Malcolm X preaches Segregationist approcach, Martin Luther King seek for integrations among whites as the solution to racism.

2. Malcolm X believed that, being non-violent in protest against racial injustice is a sign of weakness, Martin Luther King Jr believed that, non-violent approcach is one of the best solution to issue of racism.

3. Malcom X in his teachings, preached for supremacy of blacks over whites, Martin Luther King Jr, on the hand, preached self respect.

4. Malcom X preached self-defense of blacks against whites, while Martin Luther King Jr, preahed blacks to be defenseless.

5. Malcom X in his teachings represent the fire and fight of the oppressed while Martin Luther King Jr, represent the love and care of all people.

6. Both Malcom X and Martin Luther King Jr, fought for liberation of the black people from the whites supremacists.

7. Both Malcom X and Martin Luther King Jr, believed that organized protest is the way to voice their dissaproval of racial injustice in United States.

native americans

american indians have appeared on many u.s. coins including the buffalo nickel

benjamin franklin learned a lot about democracy by observing the iroquois indian

the term "indian" originated with christopher columbus. he thought that he had reached the east indies when he landed in america and therefore named the inhabitants indians.

camping

camping can relieve stress and depression

your campfire may be a hazard

long-term campsites include permanent and semi-permanent setups and can lead to closer relationships with neighboring campers

buffalo

buffalo are herbivores and feed on about 60 pounds of plant material and grasses a day.

buffalo are considered to be an adult when they reach 3 years old.

buffalo’s tail can be almost three feet long, and they use it to swap at pesky bugs.

answer: a parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislature, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament. in a parliamentary system, the head of state is usually a person distinct from the head of government. this is in contrast to a presidential system, where the head of state often is also the head of government and, most importantly, the executive does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.

countries with parliamentary democracies may be constitutional monarchies, where a monarch is the head of state while the head of government is almost always a member of parliament (such as the united kingdom, denmark, sweden, and japan), or parliamentary republics, where a mostly ceremonial president is the head of state while the head of government is regularly from the legislature (such as ireland, germany, india, and italy). in a few parliamentary republics, such as botswana, south africa, and suriname, among some others, the head of government is also head of state, but is elected by and is answerable to parliament. in bicameral parliaments, the head of government is generally, though not always, a member of the lower house.

parliamentarianism is the dominant form of government in europe, with 32 of its 50 sovereign states being parliamentarian. it is also common in the caribbean, being the form of government of 10 of its 13 island states, and in oceania. elsewhere in the world, parliamentary countries are less common, but they are distributed through all continents, most often in former colonies of the british empire that subscribe to a particular brand of parliamentarianism known as the westminster system.

explanation: