subject
History, 11.06.2020 18:57 jaelynnm

Read the excerpt from the Tinker v. Des Moines US Supreme Court decision in 1969. These petitioners merely went about their ordained rounds in school. Their deviation consisted only in wearing on their sleeve a band of black cloth, not more than two inches wide. They wore it to exhibit their disapproval of the Vietnam hostilities and their advocacy of a truce, to make their views known, and, by their example, to influence others to adopt them. They neither interrupted school activities nor sought to intrude in the school affairs or the lives of others. They caused discussion outside of the classrooms, but no interference with work and no disorder. In the circumstances, our Constitution does not permit officials of the State to deny their form of expression. What did Mary Beth and John Tinker do at school that was found to be a protected form of expression by the Supreme Court? 1 They started arguments in their classes with fellow students. 2 They led a protest rally outside the school during lunch. 3 They wore black armbands as a nonverbal show of protest. 4 They convinced other students to protest by staging a walkout.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
What form of government is powers of states? first letter of the answer is r.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
What is the meaning of the phrase “bear ’t”? what word is left out between the words but and few?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
In most native american myths, are created first.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:00
30 points and brainliest for the first person who can answer under 10 minutes, and has right ! fred rodriguez and alma morton are running for an open u.s. senate seat. during a debate, they had this exchange: "i believe that people should take responsibility for their actions," fred said. "if they are going to hurt others then they should pay for their actions. unsupervised children are to blame for many crimes. their parents should be held accountable." "many parents in our community work full time," alma replied. "they don't have enough income to pay a child-care provider. and now you're suggesting that they should be arrested for crimes their children commit? how are they supposed to feed their families if they are in jail? shame on you for suggesting such a thing! i support the families now tax that provides funds for child services." "the last thing we need is another tax," fred said. "local nonprofit agencies should children instead." which candidate’s statement implies he or she has sympathy for the problems of working families and would tend to support their platform? alma: “i support the families now tax that provides funds for child services." alma: “they don't have enough income to pay a child-care provider.” fred: "i believe that people should take responsibility for their actions." fred: "local nonprofit agencies should children instead."
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from the Tinker v. Des Moines US Supreme Court decision in 1969. These petitioners...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2021 22:30
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2021 22:30
question
Chemistry, 16.02.2021 22:30
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2021 22:30
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2021 22:30