How did the Dawes Act change the traditional way of life for Native Americans?
A. By breaking up large areas of tribal land into small plots that
would be owned by individual Native Americans
O B. By encouraging Native Americans to convert to Christianity
O C. By requiring Native Americans to learn English and dress in
Western clothes
D. By declaring bison to be endangered and refusing to let Native
Americans hunt them

Please help

D

Explanation:

The Dawes Act of 1887 authorized the Federal government to break up tribal lands of Native Americans by partitioning them into individual plots. Only those Native Americans Indians who accepted the individual allotments were allowed to become US citizens.

This Act changed deeply the traditional way of life of Native Americans, who had a history of living in tribes in larger portions of land. They also did not have the culture of farming, that also was imposed by the Act.

The Act mainly wanted to make Native Americans assimilate the American culture by annihilating their cultural and social traditions. Over 90 million acres of tribal land were stripped from Native American Indians and sold to non-natives.

the answer is: the sesquicentennial of the american civil war is an occasion to consider the legacy of that great conflict. this legacy is our inheritance, and despite many indelible features, we continue to negotiate the resolution of that conflict. the civil war was fought over slavery, but not always on behalf of slaves

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: