Think about how durham and company treated jurgis. how did the company respond to his injury? do you think their response was fair?

The Company tell him the company could not be held liable for his injury and He was sent home by the company doctor

Explanation:

In respect of how durham and company treated jurgis. After Jurgis fainted, the company doctor who should have treated him or recommend his treatment send him home because the doctor believe his injury would not heal soon, which means it will take several months to heal and the company also told him that they could not be held liable for his injury.

The response of the company wasn't fair because Jurgis injury occur while on the job which means the company should have taken responsibility for his treatment.

I said that Durham and Company said they were not responsible for Jurgis’s injury.

I wrote that the company expected Jurgis to heal for months without working or getting paid.

I gave an opinion about whether it was fair that the company took no responsibility for the accident.

Explanation:

this is what it said was the answer!

polling is a process and the outcome is not involved in the process itself.

the outcome, which is an unfavorable rating for a particular candidate is not affected by the mechanical process of polling.

it rather depends on the number of people voting in favor of the candidate.

this is an outcome of people's preferences.

sonar maybe? ? i dont know the choices