Consider the function of the US Supreme Court building. Why might architects have used Roman and Greek architectural influences to construct the US Supreme Court building, as well as other government buildings? Write a 75- to 100-word analysis of these influences.

Durability, elagant style and innovation of new materials.

Explanation:

It should be understood that during the time of construction of the US supreme court, the Roman and Greek engineers were considered to be the best. This is because of their creativity in constructing elegant structures that stand the test of time.

This is the reason why the Roman and the Greek engineers were contacted when the supreme court building was to be built.

These engineers make use of new materials, particularly concrete, and newer technologies such as the arch and the dome to make buildings, which were typically strong and well-engineered.

And that is the reason why that, most of those buildings are still standing and meeting the standard of this new age or era.

Explanation:

The US government operates on the concept of democracy, which the ancient Greeks developed. The US government also borrows many other ideas about politics and government from ancient Greece and Rome. The architects of the modern government buildings probably wanted to acknowledge the role ancient Greece and Rome played in shaping the United States’ political identity. That may be why they used Greek and Roman architectural influences when designing structures such as the US Supreme Court building.

are their options?

otherwise i can't

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)