Ahistorian is writing a paper on the idea of the divine right of kings in europe during the middle ages. she reads a speech by a bishop in the middle ages claiming that kings were appointed by god to rule over people. she then explains why the bishop would have believed this idea, even if it is not one that most people believe today. what is she doing in this paper?
the historian is explaining cause and effect.
the historian is placing the argument in historical context.
the historian is comparing and contrasting primary sources.
the historian is developing a hypothesis.

I believe the answer is :The historian is placing the argument in historical context.

Argument with historical context would tried to explain a certain historical event based on the social, political, religious,  and economic conditions that existed during a certain time and place.In the example above, the historian choose to base her argument on religious conditions in the past.

In my honest opinion , i’d say franklin d roosevelt was a president that impacted our nation , i say this because fdr is voted among top three best us presidents and he was the longest serving president by 3 terms , usually presidents only supposed to have two terms increments of 4 years , equivalent to 8 years total before election time. and he established the fdic , through the 1933 banking act and he established the us , social security system , during his presidency, and established a national minimum wage , through the fair labor standards act , fdr led the allied coalition to victory in wwii and he played a major role in the creation of the united nations.