During the decades before the Civil War, many white people in the North condemned slavery in the South. Many Southerners also
objected to slavery on moral grounds yet continued to own slaves. What most likely explains this?
A. The Southern economy was dependent on slave labor.
B. The Southern economy could not employ freed slaves.
C.
Southerners needed slaves to serve as soldiers in their armed forces.
D.
Southerners believed they had a religious duty to educate young slaves.

a

Explanation:

The southerns economy made many trades with other countries such as England. For them to stop having slavery would kill them, it was there way of life.

A: The Southern economy was dependent on slave labor.

Explanation:

It should be A. I took the test and got a 100.

answer; /// i believe that the correct answer is (divison of labor);

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."