“Challenging Traditional Authority” Is it better to obey or to challenge traditional authority? please include historical evidence such as the Renaissance, Protestant Reformation and Scientific Revolution. must be 5-6 sentences will give brainliest to the best answers.

It is better for science and progression to challenge the traditional authority.

Explanation:

For centuries, people believed the earth was at the center of the universe, and Copernicus challenged that. He was hung, but science progressed significantly because of his ideology. The protestant reformation, started by Martin Luther was a major challenge to the authority of religion and law of the time, the Catholic church. However, it led to the mass colonization of the Americas, and completely new ways of thinking about religion. The next example I would point to is Galileo, another example of science prevailing over religion. Galileo Galilei discovered a lot about astronomy that challenged the Catholic church's teachings, and so was persecuted. In conclusion, challenging traditional authority is not usually easy, and doesn't turn out well for the person doing it, but almost always has a good outcome for the world.

cherokee and arikara

congress also has implied powers, which derive from the necessary and proper clause of the constitution and permit congress "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the united states.