Why is the line- item veto considered to be unconstitutional ? The veto violates Congressional rights granted by Separation of Powers The veto is a way for the president to save money and curtail spending. The veto is not specifically listed in the Constitution as a presidential power The veto will discourage lawmakers from including "pork barrel" in new law.

Students will then investigate motives for using the veto and override ... "veto" does not appear in the Constitution the power of the President ... would violate that separation by removing two executive officers from their positions ... Construct line-item veto legislation that would be considered constitutional by .

Explanation:

the caste system in india is the paradigmatic ethnographic example of caste. it has origins in ancient india, and was transformed by various ruling elites in medieval, early-modern, and modern india, especially the mughal empire and the british raj.it is today the basis of educational and job reservations in india.it consists of two different concepts, varna and jati, which may be regarded as different levels of analysis of this system.

the caste system as it exists today is thought to be the result of developments during the collapse of the mughal era and the british colonial regime in india. the collapse of the mughal era saw the rise of powerful men who associated themselves with kings, priests and ascetics, affirming the regal and martial form of the caste ideal, and it also reshaped many apparently casteless social groups into differentiated caste communities.the british raj furthered this development, making rigid caste organisation a central mechanism of administration

i didn’t fully understand your question but i hope this you !

the constitution gives congress the power to regulate commerce "among" the several states.