Our state’s Bill of Rights extends its protections to all Texans. Rather than just simply saying “all Texans,” however, the Bill of Rights changed in 1972 to name specific groups. Regardless of your membership in any of these groups, as a Texan you are guaranteed your rights. Why would lawmakers be so specific in describing who receives rights in the state? In a short paragraph, explain your ideas and predict what might happen if the Texas Bill of Rights were not this specific.
The sample
Jeff is the same as the one in which the equation is in his hands to be a little different in his life

There are historical precedents in the United States, and in Texas itself, of people who were denied their civil rights due to their race or religion.

Explanation:

More specifically: Texas was a state that allowed slavery until the Civil War, and it was even part of the confederacy.

While the U.S. Constitution guaranteed rights to all citizens, Black people were not citizens, and they were not even considered persons by some states, which meant that their rights could be violated.

For this reason, the Texas Bill of Rights specifies the groups of people who are entitled to those rights.

- three-quarters or two-thirds..

- "the constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the house of representatives and the senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures."

< 3

the answer to your question is ( syngman rhee) have a great day