"This war is not being waged on our part...for the purpose of conquest of interfering with the rights of the established institutions of the states, but to defend and maintain the supremacy of the Constitution, and to preserve the Union."

Which individual held the beliefs expressed in the quote above?

Robert E Lee

Abraham Lincoln

Jefferson Davis

Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson

B. Abraham Lincoln

Explanation:

The slave states of Missouri, Kentucky and Maryland were concerns for President Abraham Lincoln as he felt that they might leave the Union and join the Confederate Sates of America. Also, been that he is from Kentucky, he didn't want to be seen as political failure.

The resolution made was intended to maintain and retain Unionists in those slave-holding border states. Also, it was made to reassure the Northerners that would fight to save and protect the Union.

This resolution implied that there would be end to the war upon the return of seceding states with slavery intact.

In July 1861, this resolution was introduced. It was passed by the house immediately after the battle when the Confederate army routed the Union army.

donald carl johanson (born june 28, 1943) is an american paleoanthropologist. he is known for discovering – with yves coppens and maurice taieb – the fossil of a female hominin australopithecine known as "lucy" in the afar triangle region of hadar, ethiopia.

hope this !

i googled "who was kolson johanson" and this is the answer i found.

sorry if this is incorrect.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is